Tuesday, March 18, 2014



MARCH 18 v18 TWELVE STEPPING WITH POWER IN THE PROVERB

Flipping a coin can end arguments;
it settles disputes between powerful opponents



STEP 3 - We made a decision to turn our wills and our lives over to the care of God.

Stop fighting with everybody including yourself. The Proverb mentions flipping a coin it settles disputes between powerful opponents and all I can think about is every single sport s game in the world . it goes too show you that Gods big book is a must for life and it contains all the answers you need for now and after your dead . Still trying to control the world and everybody else s well there's way too much stress for that , start focusing on you and NO you don't know everything ! That,s ok though that's why its called recovery , if want our lives back we have to let the old life go .When we do God will help up build a new one !
Tuesday, March 18th  
7:00 – 8:30pm
At The Council office, Unit 12

Please pass along the attached flyer to anyone you feel would benefit from this program.  As always, you must register yourself or your group ahead so that we may be prepared with enough materials and food/beverages.  If you have any questions, please let me know!

Thank you,


Jessica Schwartz
Volunteer Coordinator & Prevention Specialist
The Council of Southeast Pennsylvania, Inc.
252 West Swamp Road, Unit 33
Doylestown, Pennsylvania 18901
(800) 221-6333 - 24 Hour Information Line

myrecovery.com


Daily Quote

"What you are aware of you are in control of; what you are not aware of is in control of you." - Anthony De Mello


Today's Online Meetings
AA Meeting - 7:00 pm CST: "Face to Face"

Attend


Copyright 2011 Community of Recovering People LLC
Privacy Policy

Find us on Facebook

Monday, March 17, 2014

MARCH 17 v 1 TWELVE STEPPING WITH POWER IN THE PROVERB

Better a dry crust eaten in peace
than a house filled with feasting—and conflict.

STEP 9 - Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.

Better to live in a house with nothing and have peace ! Conflict is a number one trigger for a lot of folks . When all hell is breaking lose at home sometimes its a good idea to step out of the situation call your sponsor or hit your knees until the craziness start to settle down . Once the smoke settles get rid of the source of conflict by committing step nine . Remember when we were out there doing our thing we caused a lot of heartache to the ones we live with . That heartache has destroyed our credibility and our loved ones who are victims of our insanity will have a lot of resentment and bitterness towards us . We have to earn there respect and trust and that is not going to happen overnight . They will need the most time to heal so be patient with them and try and see it from their point of view don't push and get angry like the old days. Love them unconditionally like they did for you even though your every other word was lie and you cannot count on your hands how many times you robbed them .


Matthew chapter 10 v 38 - Those who do not take up their cross and follow in my STEPS are not fit to be my disciples .

Staying Cool With Glutamate
Can an over-the-counter supplement now becoming popular for mental health and mood elevation help a person stay sober? The early research is promising.

Shutterstock



03/10/14



Most addicts will tell you that it’s easier to get sober than it is to stay sober. And, the more we learn about the neurobiology of addiction, the more addiction treatment specialists are inclined to say that relapse is a part of recovery.

Do addicts have to “white knuckle” it in order to get sober and stay clean? Yes, replacement and anti-craving medications exist, but many still suffer from generally poor outcomes. Replacement therapies for opioid addiction, such as methadone and buprenorphine, and for nicotine addiction are widely accepted. Alcoholics have naltrexone and acamprosate. However, all these are substance-specific, which is a disadvantage to using them to treat addicts who have more than one substance use disorder. Also there are no FDA-approved medications for treating addiction to cocaine and other stimulants. 

Peter Kalivas, a professor and researcher at the Medical University of South Carolina, has been studying the role of glutamate—a ubiquitous excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain—in addiction for over a decade. He believes that addicts can’t learn how to improve or alter their behavior because their substance use has actually impaired a critical brain circuit involving glutamate, one that allows them to translate the desire to change into action.

He’s not alone. The glutamate homeostasis hypothesis of addiction has not only gained traction in the lab in the past 15 years, but in the past five years, hundreds of clinical trials have ramped up with a focus on attempting to heal those damaged glutamate circuits using NAC. NAC, or N-acetylcysteine, is a precursor of the naturally occurring amino acid cysteine, and it is one particular compound that has shown immense clinical promise in treating all sorts of disorders, but especially compulsive ones like addiction. NAC is not found in food, but when taken as a supplement, it breaks down into cysteine and then, glutathione—a powerful antioxidant. What’s more, cysteine is essential to maintaining optimal levels of glutamate.

You might have seen NAC at your local Whole Foods, in fact—it’s a common supplement. It received FDA approval in 1963, and has been used since to treat symptoms of bronchitis, COPD and Tylenol overdoses, among many other diverse, off-label uses. It has gained attention in recent years as scientists learn more about its role in addiction—and preventing relapse.

Preliminary clinical studies have shown the promise of NAC in terms of safety, tolerability, and potential efficacy for encouraging abstinence from cocaine, nicotine, and cannabis. There are hundreds of clinical trials underway in the US studying NAC in the treatment of various disorders, including addiction to alcohol, cocaine, marijuana, nicotine, and methamphetamine, and for behavioral addictions, namely gambling. And, with trials underway for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, autism, compulsive and grooming disorders, schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder—well, it makes NAC one of the most promising drug candidates in neuropsychiatry.

Glutamate homeostasis

A growing body of research has linked changes in the glutamate neurotransmitter system to addiction. When addicts use, they deplete this chemical, which is essential for transmitting signals from the cortex to the nucleus accumbens. The cortex can be thought of as the decision-making center of the brain, while the nucleus accumbens—which is also involved in the dopamine circuit—is the habit area. In addicts, this circuit becomes weak at best, broken at worst. “Even though they know it’s bad, they can’t use this information to change their behavior effectively,” Kalivas says. Because they can’t update their “habit” in response to different instructions from the cortex, they keep on using despite their own better judgment.

The glutamate system maintains a balance of synaptic—between two neurons—and extracellular—outside of neurons—glutamate via a few different ways. One is an “exchange” molecule, which maintains an optimal level of glutamate inside and outside neurons; another is the number of receptors themselves. In any case, when levels of glutamate become off-balance, addictive behavior trumps so-called reason: cravings and relapse result.

A number of research studies have implicated glutamate dysfunction in addiction. In a 2002 study, David Baker, then at the Medical University of South Carolina and now at Marquette University in Wisconsin, found that repeated administration of cocaine in rats lowered glutamate levels. A paper the following year showed that these changes underlie relapse in cocaine users. In 2009, Kalivas published a study in rats that showed treatment with NAC re-activated stalled glutamate pumps and restored glutamate levels to normal. In 2011, he found that NAC treatment not only restored synaptic plasticity, but that it could be tied to less relapse behavior in rats. 

“When glutamate transmission is in balance, we can learn; when it’s out of balance, we can’t learn,” Kalivas says. This is called synaptic plasticity, and in addiction, this flexibility of our brain circuits to adapt to change all but dries up. 

NAC—on trial

While the FDA approved NAC for treating specific conditions unrelated to addictive disorders over 50 years ago, some recent preliminary clinical trials suggest that NAC could be useful in the treatment of many other disorders, including SUDs.

Kevin Gray, also a professor and researcher at the Medical University of South Carolina, led the first randomized controlled trial for treating marijuana addiction, and they published their results in 2012. The trial involved cannabis-dependent adolescents, and participants received either 1200 mg NAC or a placebo twice daily throughout the 8-week treatment. They found that those who received NAC had more than twice the odds of achieving marijuana abstinence—reflected in “clean” urine drug tests—than those who received placebo. It is important to note that subjects received traditional behavioral treatment along with their dose of NAC.

“Given the controlled nature of the trial, we feel it reflects a real effect of NAC in enhancing response to behavioral treatment,” Gray says. “It targets one of many factors involved in addiction—nobody has, to date, tested whether it could work as a standalone treatment. For now, the evidence indicates that it is a helpful complement to psychosocial [or] behavioral treatment.” His group is currently conducting a follow-up study of sorts, across multiple sites and spanning 12 weeks, to test how NAC affects treatment success of cannabis-dependent adults.

Clinical trials for using NAC to treat relapse in cocaine addicts have also shown promising, albeit mixed, results. This is important because currently, there are no medications to treat cocaine and stimulant addiction. In a trial published in 2013, researchers tested the effect of NAC on treating cocaine addicts. The study, led by Robert Malcolm, also at MUSC, found that among users who received either 1200 milligrams NAC, 2400 milligrams NAC, or a placebo on a daily basis over the course of eight weeks, only subjects who were already abstinent had longer times to relapse and lower cravings if they were taking the 2400 milligrams. This suggests that NAC may be useful in preventing relapse among cocaine addicts who have already gotten sober, says Kalivas, who was involved with the trial study. In fact, they’ve already begun a trial along these lines. 

Not a cure-all 

To be sure, a supplement like NAC isn’t going to be a cure-all. As Kalivas says, “cure is a little strong of a word.” NAC works by ultimately increasing the amount of glutamate available to neurons—and, the more glutamate, the better signal transmission and the easier it becomes for addicts to break habits and learn new behaviors. “Basically it resets synapses and so they now have the opportunity to learn.” And while it may enable recovery, it won’t make any difference if an addict doesn’t change his lifestyle.

Trials have focused on determining the efficacy of using NAC in conjunction with traditional therapies, not as a replacement. “The reason for this whole line of research is the limited—[even] poor—abstinence outcomes with existing psychosocial [or] behavioral treatments,” Gray says. “We see NAC as a strong candidate for safe pharmacological augmentation of psychosocial treatment for substance use disorders.”

While he and others prescribe it to their patients “off-label,” some specialists are reluctant. “I don’t prescribe it since it is not FDA approved for this indication and there hasn’t been a large clinical trial to prove its efficacy yet,” says Khaled Moussawi, previously at MUSC and now a neurology resident at Massachusetts General Hospital, who has done research himself on glutamate and its role in addiction. “All the data we have are preliminary.” And, unfortunately, some don’t see FDA approval in the future: “There will never be FDA approval because why would a company go to those lengths when the supplement is available in every health food store in the country?” says Jon Grant of the University of Chicago, who led a recent trial for using NAC to treat obsessive hair pulling, a condition known as trichotillomania.

Over-the-counter?

NAC can be purchased at any health foods store, but…you might want to consult with your doctor before starting to “pop” any pill, even an antioxidant supplement. According to multiple sources, it seems safe; however, there can be side effects, even if they’re relatively benign: nausea, indigestion, headache, and abdominal pain. It has been suggested that NAC may increase excretion of trace minerals; some evidence, however, suggests that this effect is too minimal to make a real difference. Nutritionists would suggest that individuals taking NAC for an extended period of time should also consider taking a multivitamin supplement.

Oral bioavailability of NAC has been shown to range from a mere 4 to 10 percent. It typically comes in 600-milligram capsules, which is much lower than the doses given in most of the clinical trials—it doesn’t necessarily have to be delivered orally, but that’s what’s safest and available to consumers at the moment. Given those two facts, it might not work at all.

There can be dangers to taking too much of it, as well as with other medications. According to the University of Maryland Medical Center, recommended adult doses of NAC vary depending on the health condition being treated; however, very high doses (more than 7 grams) of cysteine may be toxic. UMM also advises against drug-drug interactions. If you are being treated with medications that suppress the immune system (azathioprine (Imuran), cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan), or prednisone (Deltasone)); nitroglycerin and isosorbide (Isordil), two medications commonly used to treat chest pain; oxiconazole (Oxistat), an antifungal medication used for athlete’s foot; or activated charcoal; you should not use cysteine supplements without first talking to your doctor.

Jeanene Swanson is a regular contributor to The Fix. She last wrote about mental disorders and addiction.
Death by Lethal Incompetence

The state of Missouri got its latest batch of death penalty drugs in a backroom deal as shady as any street drug deal. If we can't do the death penalty right, maybe we should reconsider doing it at all.

Shutterstock



03/11/14


25 years ago on the morning of March 22nd Michael Taylor and Roderick Nunley abducted Ann Harrison, a 15-year-old high school student, from her home in Kansas City, Missouri. They raped and murdered her and left her body in the trunk of a stolen car.

After their arrest the two men confessed to the crime. In an unsuccessful gambit they waived their right to a trial to appear before a judge to avoid the death penalty, but there was no mercy and they were both sentenced to death by lethal injection.


People actually support the idea of the death penalty. In reality it's highly selective, takes forever, costs a bundle and they still can’t get it right!

Nunley is not yet able to mark his execution date on his calendar but his partner in crime was executed on Wednesday, February 26th. It took him just under ten minutes to die. Ann Harrison’s father was present at the execution but made no comment after the event.

Taylor and Nunley did it. They confessed to the crime. DNA evidence connects them both to Ann and the basement where she was murdered; there’s no doubt about that. Justice has been served. But whether you believe the death penalty is an appropriate form of punishment or not, the way Missouri’s department of corrections has behaved in the run-up to the execution of Michael Taylor is undignified and embarrassing. 

Missouri is on a roll. Taylor’s execution makes four in as many months. In Taylor’s final appeal, hours before his death, his lawyers demanded to know what drugs would be used to kill him and where they were coming from—facts that the state of Missouri refused to reveal. How could the efficacy of these drugs be verified? Where were they purchased? But although the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit allowed Missouri to complete the execution as planned, the three judges were clearly not impressed:

'Because Taylor seeks to determine whether the drug to be used in his execution will result in pain or in a lingering death, it bears repeating the importance of the identities of the pharmacists, laboratories, and drug suppliers in determining whether Missouri’s execution of death row inmates is constitutional.'

Michael Taylor was killed with an overdose of the anesthetic pentobarbital. But this dose didn’t come from the manufacturer. In last minute behind-the-scenes shenanigans, the Missouri Department of Corrections was forced to change the supplier of the drug and refused to reveal anything about the new pharmacy or its product. 

There are two main ways of executing a prisoner by lethal injection. The three-drug protocol and the one-drug protocol. The three-drug version begins with an injection of an anesthetic followed by a paralytic agent (a muscle relaxant) to stop breathing and finally a drug to stop the heart. The one-drug protocol is basically fatal overdose of a single sedative/anesthetic.

In the last few years pharmaceutical companies, upset that drugs intended to alleviate pain are being misused in the U.S., have done everything they can to keep their products out of the hands of the executioners. Missouri and the other 34 death penalty states are running out of options.

In 2010 when Hospira, the sole U.S. manufacturers of thiopental sodium—one of the three key drugs in the three drug cocktail preferred for execution in most U.S. states—discovered Ohio’s DOC using their product they took the unusual step of abandoning its production. Hospira states on its website:

‘Hospira makes its products to enhance and save the lives of the patients we serve, and, therefore, we have always publicly objected to the use of any of our products in capital punishment.’

What followed was a black comedy of errors. Death penalty states scrambled for fresh supplies and several successfully imported fresh stocks from Europe but that source dried up after European Union governments banned its export, effectively re-licensing the drug as it would arms or munitions. Importing sodium thiopental to the U.S. is actually illegal because its importation has to be approved by the Federal Drugs Administration (FDA). Unbelievably, the FDA turned a blind eye to this breach of law and during a fiasco that ended up in the Federal Appeals court, the court ruled the FDA was in utter‘derogation of its duty’ by allowing the drug into the country untested and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) confiscated the stockpiles. 

All over the country DOCs were getting desperate. Last year Colorado came up empty after sending out a begging letter to compounding pharmacies all over the state to provide the sodium thiopental needed to execute murderer Nathan Dunlap. Governor John Hickenlooper finally stepped in to stop the drama and issued a reprieve for Dunlap.

Missouri switched to a single drug protocol to speed things up. Initially they planned to use the commonly used propofol (the anesthetic that killed Michael Jackson) until not only that manufacturer objected but the Missouri Society of Anesthesiologists complained that the DOC was putting their access to a drug they use for over 95% of their surgeries in danger. They fished around again until they came up with the current favorite, pentobarbital—a drug that is sometimes used for physician-assisted-suicide in Oregon State. Of course the moment pentobarbital’s manufacturers, Lundbeck, got wind of the practice they attempted to cut off the supply. 

It looks like The Missouri DOC did some pretty shady dealing to get hold of the pentobarbital that killed Taylor. Missouri ignored Lunbeck’s wishes and though they won’t reveal the company where they finally obtained the death dose, we do know it was a distributor known as a ‘compounding pharmacy’.

Compounding pharmacies make custom drugs to order. They alter drugs to suit the needs of specific patients, for example they might remove inactive ingredients from a pill if a patient discovers an allergy to part of the medication, say the capsule itself. The drugs are mixed to order, and it stands to reason that a custom batch may have slightly different amounts in each dose and their ingredients might differ from the manufacturer's. Some larger compounding pharmacies have been producing copies of drugs on a much larger scale, creating a gray market. As these ‘pill mills’ aren’t required to meet the same standards the FDA requires of Big Pharma, the legitimacy of these ‘bootleg’ drugs is in question.

In September 2012 the Center for Disease Control (CDC) traced an outbreak of fungal meningitis that killed 64 across 20 states to the New England Compounding Center in Framingham, Massachusetts and though a bill was passed in response to the tragedy, the additional oversight from the FDA still only puts compounding pharmacies on an honor system when it comes to regulation.

The most damning criticism of Missouri’s behavior came from the U.S. Court of Appeals following their dismissal of Taylor’s final appeal. They attacked the state for:

‘..using [a] shadow pharmac[y] hidden behind the hangman's hood' [and using] 'copycat pharmaceuticals' to execute another death row inmate.'

Clearly appalled that Missouri was unable to execute death row inmates with an FDA-approved form of pentobarbital the court suggested the DOC had resorted to:

'[A] pharmacy [that] could be nothing more than a high school chemistry class.'

The DOC should have been transparent about its procedures—Taylor had a right to know. 

In fact the only information released about the Missouri’s drug hunt is from their previous buys. They sent a guard down to Oklahoma with cash, he paid for the drug and drove it back up to Missouri. Not, one might imagine, the usual protocol for states obtaining pharmaceuticals. (AP reports that it cost Missouri $8000 per dose.) That pharmacy wisely stepped away from the furor, leaving Missouri again with an empty syringe.

Add to this the evidence that lethal injections are being carried out by inexperienced DOC personnel who sometimes botch the procedure completely. Missouri does not require physicians to be present at executions. Unsurprisingly, professionals who are ethically bound to protect life are also in short supply when it comes to shooting up a lethal dose, but it is precisely those professionals who are needed to ensure a humane procedure.

In September of 2009 the governor of Ohio halted Ronell Broom's execution after an execution team struggled for two hours to find a vein to end the life of the convicted murderer-rapist. He remains on death row. Could being executed twice be seen as a cruel and unusual punishment?

Americans are slowly turning against the death penalty. 60% of the nation is in favor of execution. That’s the lowest figure since 1972, and only a slim majority now think the sentence is applied fairly.

Richard Dieter from the Death Penalty Information Center says the death penalty is falling apart not from a human rights perspective but a lack of enthusiasm for it.

“There’s too many problems. Lethal injection [of Michael Taylor] is one more example of the ineptitude of the state in carrying out this law. People actually support the idea of the death penalty. In reality, it's highly selective, takes forever, costs a bundle and they still can’t get it right! I think the death penalty is becoming irrelevant.”

Questions surrounding the effectiveness of the drugs, the transparency of their origin and their application are giving more and more death row prisoners an opportunity to appeal their sentences, and rightly so. If we are going to use lethal injection and assume the responsibility of taking a human life then we should take it seriously. If we can’t do it with dignity then perhaps we shouldn’t do it at all. 

Neville Elder is a regular contributor to The Fix. He last wrote about the man behind the first supervised injection site in North America.